It's all fun and games until something has to be graded.
I love what I do. I love my students, I love my campuses, I love my subject. I even (mostly) love getting up and going to work in the morning.
Most days, I can't believe I actually get paid for hanging out in the coffee shop, talking with students about their ideas, as is the format of conference weeks, which just ended Monday. Those days, its all lattes and literature and spirited conversation. It's fun.
But, like an unfortunate amount of this world's frivolity, there's a looming dark side; mine was in the form of a virtual ream of paper sitting in the literal blackness of the bottom on my bag--under the table, out of sight, but not quite mind. Report papers, of varying length, content, and quality: all awaiting my undivided attention.
Have I mentioned that I hate grading? How I despise ferreting out misplaced modifiers and AWOL thesis statements? How long and exhausting and generally disappointing it all is?
I had meant to stick with my tried and true "5 a day" format which gets my 45 papers done in a painless, timely manner. Trouble was--as it has been for the past few rounds of papers--I haven't had the time or gumption to look at even a single paper on a given day in the past two plus weeks. As the days passed, the pile became more uncomfortable to think about, more worrisome to ponder. Like a mob boss after a hit, I wanted to toss my bag of paper skeletons into the fresh cement of one of our many campus construction sites, but I knew I had nowhere to run. Regular class resumes tomorrow and I move operations from the campus Starbucks back to class. And the students are expecting their papers. As of this writing 2/3 of the papers--2 out of my three classes-- have been evaluated.
The other class is going to be silenced with donut holes and coffee and mollified with an extension on their next paper: due Friday. Because I have to do something to stop the gushing flow of ink before I drown.
My life currently takes place at three universities, through two bridge tunnels and one state line: and I wouldn't have it any other way
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Sunday, November 10, 2013
Fall
Cotton ready for harvest in NC |
Garden Spider who lived in my beans and squash for about a month |
The Minister |
U1 Library |
Outside our favorite Elizabeth City coffeehouse bar near U2 |
back yard spider web |
Switchfoot show at U2 |
The Minister at The Cure coffeehouse in Norfolk |
Just a typical Elizabeth City scene |
Saturday, November 09, 2013
An RWL Fashion Alert
Disclaimer:
Runningwithletters isn’t a fashion blog.
It’s highly suggested that readers familiarize themselves with the dingy t-shirt confessional, the feminine liner sweat guards, the episode with the New York pants and the ill-fated clothing swap before acting on any advice offered
herein.
Blah, blah, all right, with the requisite legalese out of the way, let’s get to my exciting fashion reveal.
I have an excellent lead on a major fashion trend set to hit
the U.S. around February. I’ve decided to get on the cutting edge of this one,
and, in the spirit or sharing and good will, I’m passing the tip on to my
readers just in time for holiday gift giving.
Regular readers are likely looking for a punch line, but
this is a case of straight-up reportage.
Around mid-winter, I predict women everywhere will be sporting arm cuffs
like these:
The Baker wearing a vintage find |
The reason? Downtown
Abbey’s track record of sparking interest in vintage fashion combined with the
fact that on a Season 4 episode that aired in England in October, Lady Edith wore a smart, sassy gold arm band that looked like this:
Thursday, November 07, 2013
The View from The Bubble
“They really like you, Brad,” I informed my husband, “as a
character. They want more of you.”
“Dad did well in the focus group, huh?” The Baker chimed in.
“Do I get paid?” my husband asked, hopefully.
“Since when do you get paid for being a character in my
stories?” I retorted.
I went on to explain that my fellow MFA workshoppers and our
leader, Dan, made special note of how genuine and realistic Brad came across in
his scenes from the essays I’d submitted for my evening in the bubble.
I was heartened that he played well, because, let’s face it,
dialogue is tough and when a writer hears they nailed it, it’s always good
news. I was also glad they liked him
because he is wonderful, and that means that I did my job with
characterization, too. But what meant
the most was that it meant that I was able to be funny without making fun.
I also discovered that the workshop, as a whole, really
seems to be warming up to my genre. As
I’ve mentioned in prior posts, they’ve not had a class clown in the entire
history of the program. In a sea of
biographies, travelogues, and other meaty works, no one was expecting a
comic.
Of course, it’s never all roses and chocolate inside the
bubble—although Dan provided me with a tootsie pop upon my arrival to, you
know, keep me quiet. The group discussed
my controversial habit of capitalizing Important Things for emphasis, the pros
and cons of my darker hypochondria jokes, and whether or not my witticisms
would wear thin over the course of an entire manuscript. The was even a section where they tried to
decipher a cryptically worded scene and somehow decided that a woman was levitating over padded
chairs at church—which is NOT at all what happened. I nearly choked on my tootsie pop, offering a
strong clue that they’d gotten the scene all wrong.
Most of the time, I imagined I was at a book club featuring
my book, hot off the press. It was so
exciting to watch people grappling over the text, trying to derive the true
meaning of my words and--levitating parishioner aside—getting it right most of
the time!
I have been thinking today about one workshopper’s
comment. She was musing over my overarching theme of being a
frustrated writer. “It’s no wonder she
doesn’t get any writing done,” she said.
“She’s got all of these interests—gets
all excited about something, and the next chapter it’s something else. I think she could make a whole them out of
that,” she said.
It amazed me to have someone see through me so thoroughly,
based only on just a couple essays. It’s
good news, because I communicated my character—but it’s bad news, too, because
she’s right. If I stuck to my work, I’d
have my book in print by now.
But part of it is knowing what to stick to. Writing isn’t a liner career path. Some days I feel like my best shot is to
simply live and amass experience. A week
later, I think sending queries to agents is the trick, but a couple rejections
in, I think it best to work on my local news story and hope the AP takes
notice.
I think everyone’s path is different, but I think it’s time
that I find one and walk it long enough to give it time to work. After all, Brad is waiting to get his check
for being a great character. I can’t let
him down.
Wednesday, November 06, 2013
Warning: Visible Crack. Help Needed.
At the suggestion of my pastor, i am showing some crack today.
In a memorable moment in this past Sunday’s sermon, Pastor Tom discussed the merits of people showing their cracks. To be fair, he was actually recounting another sermon when he repeatedly used the unfortunate word choice while making a life metaphor concerning a lovely but broken piece of pottery. Situations like these are why I love Pastor Tom.
In a memorable moment in this past Sunday’s sermon, Pastor Tom discussed the merits of people showing their cracks. To be fair, he was actually recounting another sermon when he repeatedly used the unfortunate word choice while making a life metaphor concerning a lovely but broken piece of pottery. Situations like these are why I love Pastor Tom.
Personally, I couldn’t be any more pleased that
crack-flashing is spiritually sound, as the cracks at my house are of such a
size they are becoming impossible to hide.
So much is falling through the canyon-sized fissures: a ream of student
papers, ungraded, all my socks and underwear, keys, wallets, library books, even digital data
like emails and picture files.
I’ve never been able to keep it all together, really. Several months ago I posted a call for
applications on facebook. In clear,
inviting language, I announced that I had openings for maids, a cook, butler,
chauffeur, under butler, and footmen…especially footmen. To my surprise, no one responded, not even
the unemployed teens among my circle of friends. Evidently no one is interested in an entry-level
position as a footman. The sparse comments simply stated the terse observation
that I was watching too much Downton Abbey.
As if that was the only issue.
Honestly, it would take the combined efforts of a whole full
time staff of professionals to keep my show in order. I spent a good chunk of
the wee hours dealing with racing thoughts springing from my evening in the bubble and worries over whether or not some particularly crisp photos of my garden
spider had been mistakenly deleted. I
awoke from a fitful half sleep at pre-dawn and was vaguely concerned as to why
the head of a Renaissance statue was in my bed.
You can totally see the head, right?? |
I was surprisingly calm at the thought of a Cellini or a Michelangelo
in my bed and I began to wonder if I should replace the under butler position
in favor of an in-house shrink. I then
realized I was sleeping with some creatively bungled laundry that fell through
the cracks and onto my bed. Having now displayed my crack and the resulting dirty laundry, I am now in
search of a spiritual cleanse and a laundry room attendant. Interested parties may apply through Facebook.
Ok--so I've showed my crack, now you show yours...(that's the way it works, right?) What's unseemly in your corner of the earth?
Tuesday, November 05, 2013
Recent Analysis: I Write Like a mini Corey Doctorow, Oscar Wilde, or my Husky Audrey
It’s my turn to go into the bubble tonight and it could get
interesting.
“The bubble” is MFA speak for everyone in the room
discussing your work while you remain completely inert.
If post-class commentary is any indicator, my first bubble
experience went exceedingly well. The
prevailing sentiment was that I am freaking hilarious, although with a penchant
toward going “over the top" and relying on endings that “over-state
their case.”
They don’t necessarily see the logical path from a missing sandwich to the complexity of stories on and off the page, or a damaged breakfast icon to the salvage of lost dreams.
Part of me thinks it’s their loss and part of me worries.
“You’re the only one in the program who has ever attempted
to do this,” prof Dan Not His Real Name explained.
Overall, that’s not really great news, because the humorous-yet-meaningful
essay concept of isn’t original. What it
says to me is that no one in the program knows the genre. We’ve already established the fact that I’ve
read entirely different books than the rest of the cadre. Which means my literary “teachers”—writers
like Robert Fulgham and Lori Notaro—are complete strangers to those who will be
coaching me toward what I dream could be my eventual success in the genre.
But I’m also left to wonder if, perhaps in a world where
political unrest, financial crisis, and natural disaster demand the attention
of our best minds, even-- perhaps especially-- our scribes, there’s not much
need for observations from the back of the fridge, or other tiny little specks
on the globe.
Tonight’s bubble experience will be further complicated by
the fact that, due to a formatting error (I forgot to double space) I
accidently sent twice as much material as requested. Further analysis revealed the possibility probability that I sent a less-than-thoroughly edited rendition of the text, thereby
increasing the likelihood for spirited discussion, and an riveting experience
within the bubble. I figure it’s the
closest I’ll ever get to being a fly on the wall.
Note: an email came in from Dan, mid-post composition, asking the workshoppers to go to plug in a few sentences of our work to determine which famous author we are most like. I sampled 4 pieces of text—two were my most recent blog posts) and discovered that I’m a mini Corey Doctorow. Or perhaps Oscar Wilde. Maybe Margaret Alwood. Or, who knows, Stephanie Meyer. It’s just as likely that I emulate my Husky, Audrey, who has a strong voice—prone to all manner of prolonged ululations—but not very good at communicating her intended meaning. Take your pick.
Note: an email came in from Dan, mid-post composition, asking the workshoppers to go to plug in a few sentences of our work to determine which famous author we are most like. I sampled 4 pieces of text—two were my most recent blog posts) and discovered that I’m a mini Corey Doctorow. Or perhaps Oscar Wilde. Maybe Margaret Alwood. Or, who knows, Stephanie Meyer. It’s just as likely that I emulate my Husky, Audrey, who has a strong voice—prone to all manner of prolonged ululations—but not very good at communicating her intended meaning. Take your pick.
And this piece evidently harkens of nineteenth century horror icon:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)